Practical considerations

This section discusses practical strategies and technologies for supporting students with ASD to develop and improve their communication and self-management skills.

It also looks at the issue of challenging behaviour, pointing out that the behaviour of those around them can also be problematic for students with ASD. Teachers will find practical advice for analysing, understanding, and devising strategies for addressing difficult behaviour.

The section then discusses the use of Individual Education Plans and Behaviour Intervention Plans, and how to make strategic use of teacher aides.

Incorporating visual supports and technology

In the DVD Autism at School: A Video Resource for Teachers and Parents in New Zealand, psychologist Leonard Nels explains that people with ASD, unlike most people, use the visual parts of the brain to process information and problem-solve. For example, when students with ASD learn the alphabet, they use the part of the brain that looks at and recognises shapes. For this reason, teachers need to make strong use of visual supports for their students with ASD. 

The systematic use of visual aids to aid expressive and receptive communication is also called augmentative communication. Depending on students’ literacy levels, visual aids may use pictures, words, or a combination. Examples include:

  • visual timetables
  • schedules that outline the steps of a task
  • boards on which students can post an activity as they complete it
  • visual timers.

These measures are typically cheap and non-intrusive and facilitate the kind of explicit teaching that benefits all students.

The New Zealand Autism Spectrum Disorder Guideline discusses the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS). PECS encourages the person with ASD to initiate communication and interact with others by exchanging symbols, pictures, photographs, or objects for a desired object. It involves the careful use of prompts and planned generalisation. There is considerable information on PECS available on the Internet, including many YouTube clips. You could start with the introduction provided on the iCommunicate website.

New technologies offer new possibilities for augmentative communication, but approach these opportunities with caution. The New Zealand Autism Spectrum Disorder Guideline notes that there is little research on specific computer programmes for people with ASD but that:

… there is some evidence that computer technology may enhance motivation, increase attention, and reduce challenging behaviour in individuals across the ability range. Computer-based schemes are seen as particularly valuable for literacy development.

Page 100

Victoria University professor Jeff Sigafoos [link to R81] and Canterbury University senior lecture Dr Dean Sutherland have a particular interest in the use of assistive technologies [1] to enhance communication for students with ASD and other disabilities. An article in the New Zealand Education Review (Chajecka, 2010) discusses their research into these technologies, especially the potential of devices such as the iPad.

[1] The term ‘assistive technology’ refers to any device that is used to support the functional capabilities of a person with disabilities.  Assistive technologies for people with ASD include ‘augmentative and alternative communication systems’ that support, supplement, or develop communication, such as voice output devices and electronic picture systems.  (See the glossary in the New Zealand Autism Spectrum Disorder Guideline for more information.)

Sigafoos is quoted as suggesting that:

… devices such as iPad may decrease frustration and subsequent problem behaviours because although the children may not be able to speak, they will be able to communicate and interact more fully with others …

Sigafoos says once the children learn to communicate their needs and preferences, they may play a bigger role in their own education. Teachers may be able to work with the students to fit the curriculum around their strengths and better support their learning.

Chajecka, 2010

The article concludes with some advice about applications that are currently available for students with special education needs.

The resource library includes a link to a part of the Ministry of Education’s website that discusses how assistive technologies can be used and accessed.

The Digital Imaging in Special Education (DISE) project provides an example of assistive technologies in action at a New Zealand school.

The Do2learn website has an extensive range of downloadable resources for parents and teachers, as well as instructions for creating your own.

Self-management skills and challenging behaviours

The New Zealand Autism Spectrum Disorder Guideline describes behaviour problems as ‘the most challenging and stressful issue facing parents and educators of children and young people with ASD’ (page 119).

The problem, however, is two-way:

From a child’s perspective, parents and teachers demonstrate problem behaviours by putting the child in situations which they find difficult, by:

  • making demands they are unable to comprehend
  • communicating and expecting communication in ways that are difficult to understand
  • expecting them to engage in social interaction and tasks in which they have little or no interest or skill
  • limiting engagement in their interests.
Page 119

Emphasise the positive

The Guideline (pages 119–124) includes suggestions for behavioural interventions to increase positive behaviour, decrease problem behaviour, and improve the quality of life for all concerned.

Exactly what works will be different for each student, but the key for all students is that those who care for them do their best to understand and address the triggers for problem behaviour. Those triggers may lie in the physical, learning, or social environment.

An ecological assessment and/or sensory profiling will identify these triggers and suggest solutions. For example:

  • a student who is bothered by a bright overhead light may simply need to be moved to another part of the room
  • a student whose behaviour deteriorates when the teacher is away may need more support to prepare for the change
  • a student who disrupts a special assembly may need to have been told in advance about the change in routine
  • a student who spoils other children’s play may need help to understand rule changes
  • a student who gets loudly upset when expected to switch from a favourite activity may need to be gently prepared for the change and be given a visual reminder that there will be an opportunity to return to it
  • a student who never seems to complete tasks may need the task to be broken down into parts.

Empathy

The common factor in each of the scenarios listed above is anxiety. School can be a bewildering place for learners with ASD. When their needs are not met, the constant stress is heightened. They need those around them to help them make sense of their environment and be sensitive to their needs.

Empathy is a fundamental requirement for effective relationships. One of the reviewers of this resource described a teacher professional development session led by clinical psychologist Olive Webb. Olive’s approach helped the teachers to understand the perspectives of their students with ASD. It could be adapted to other groups in your school:

Olive asked if any of the teachers suffered vertigo. Several said they did. She asked them to imagine standing on the glass floor in the Sky Tower viewing platform. Faces paled, palms became became sweaty. “How do you feel?” she asked. Trembling, breathless responses. “Now, can you ‘snap out’ of it?”

The point was made.

Mark Potter, Principal, Berhampore School

Functional behavioural assessments

The Guideline strongly advocates the functional assessment of problem behaviours. Functional assessment is based on the premise that a student’s behaviour has a purpose – there is something they want to communicate or achieve. It is also another way of identifying elements in the environment that may be supporting the behaviour.   

The Guideline suggests that:

Some common functions of behaviours are:

  • the communication of needs and wants
  • social attention
  • social avoidance
  • escape from difficult or boring tasks or other aversive situations
  • access to tangible items and preferred activities
  • generation of sensory reinforcement or stimulation.
Page 122

The steps for conducting a functional assessment are:

  1. Describe the problem behaviour in detail.
  2. Identify the times and circumstances (contexts and triggers) that are regularly associated with the occurrence (or non-occurrence) of the behaviour.
  3. Identify the consequences that maintain the behaviour.
  4. Develop hypotheses about the function or purpose of the behaviour and collect observational data to support or reject each hypothesis.
  5. On the basis of the assessment, design an intervention to bring about an alternative behaviour.

For some students, it may be helpful to draw up a Behaviour Intervention Plan (see below).

Examples of the functional behavioural approach

New Zealand educators discuss how to implement a functional approach to behaviour management in the DVD Autism at School: A Video Resource for Teachers and Parents in New Zealand. In line with the approach recommended in the Guideline, they say the key is to understand and address the cause of the behaviour. As the following examples show, unwanted behaviour is diminished when the cause of the stress is addressed.

Speech therapist Sheryl Wills explains that if a student wants time out and is showing that by throwing things, she teaches them to use a visual support such as a card saying ‘Time out’. When they feel stressed, they can show her the card. More verbal students may just need to be taught to say the words ‘I need a break’. This approach is likely to require a lot of individual attention at first, but this can be reduced over time. 

RTLB Peggy Waite describes how a teacher implemented a similar strategy called ‘Stop, Think, Do’  with a boy who needs to leave the classroom when pressures build. Rather than calling out, he now has a card to hold up and a specific place to go when he needs help. He can leave, and the teacher can request someone to take the class so that she can work with him until he is ready to come back. This used to happen several times a day, but has since dropped to just once per week.

Peggy Waite emphasises that results are best when teachers and principals work with parents and families to notice what the issues are for students and plan for their success. In another example, Andrew (one of the boys featured in the DVD) was getting into conflict when returning to school after the holidays. His care community realised that the cause was anxiety about the transitions in and out of holidays. In response, they now plan for transition. This includes allowing him to attend for shorter days over the first week or two and to take a day off if needed, and devising strategies to prepare Andrew and his new teacher to work together.

Teacher Laetitia de Vries has used an approach called the ‘Scales of Justice’. When conflict arises between Andrew and one of his peers, she sits them together and uses actual scales. The students take turns explaining what the other did wrong and each time she puts a wooden block on the scales. She usually finds at the end that the person who was most in the wrong has the most blocks. The students can see that they both did something wrong, but who did the most:

That is a visual technique for them to understand where it all went wrong. It’s a fantastic tool for dealing with conflict in a really visual way that helps them to understand.

Laetitia de Vries in Smith, 2009

Paula Kluth (2010) has a list of useful suggestions:

Ideas to use in the prevention of behavior problems

  • Look for competence in students and see the best in them.
  • Be respectful. Speak about students using positive language and never speak about students in front of them.
  • Look for sensory offenders. This might be something that those without autism do not even notice, such as a flickering light or a sound in the distance.
  • Make sure the person experiences joy, novelty, and fun at school. Lessons should be appropriately varied, favorite topics and activities should be included in the curriculum, and students should have plenty of opportunities to shine.
  • Make sure the person has opportunities for social connection and relationship building (e.g., games, free time to talk) throughout the day.
  • Always be sure the learner has a way (or many ways) to communicate. If the person is nonverbal or does not have reliable speech, he or she will need augmentative and alternative communication for socializing with peers, responding to the teacher, and engaging in lessons.
  • Provide plenty of opportunities for movement during the day. Build walking or sensory breaks into the day for the purpose of regulating and releasing tension. When an individual seems especially frustrated or “off”, look for opportunities for vigorous exercise (e.g., taking laps with a friend on the playground).
  • Teach by the numbers. Help the student to recognise and interpret feelings that lead to a breakdown. Use a number scale or similar tool to have the student describe and visualize his emotional state. Then teach about different scenarios. For example, if the teacher starts class 5 minutes late, he might put himself at 2/10 on the scale; if his piano teacher is sick and misses a lesson, it might rate a 6/10. Teaching and discussing this process during calm moments makes it more likely the student will be able to draw on the language and descriptions when he needs it.
  • Be explicit about rules, norms, procedures, and expectations. Students’ behaviors may be their response to a confusing world. Provide a list of school and classroom rules in a student’s notebook or desk as well as a list of ideas he or she can use to relax and deal with difficult moments.
  • Think beyond smiles and frowns. Avoid categorizing each hour or segment of the day as “good” or “bad”, as in, “How did you do in math?” and, “Were you good during first period?” Many behavioral programs put students in a position of being evaluated and assessed day in and out (e.g., a smiley face for a segment of good behavior and a frown for a segment of bad behavior). This constant scrutiny can be very stressful.
  • Break it down. Chunking big tasks into more manageable parts can prevent some difficulties. A child will probably respond better to a request to “pick up ten blocks” than to “clean up the play area”.
  • Adapt if possible. Assess the student’s environment to see which tasks or activities cause problems and whether these can be avoided or adapted in some way. For instance, if the child gets into trouble on the bus when he sits near older students, assign him a seat mate, allow him to play a video game during the trip, or offer him extra credit for observations he makes during the ride (e.g., how long the bus takes to get to his house on average).
Kluth, 2010, page 208

The Do2learn website has resources you can use to assess behaviour, determine its function, and implement behaviour management strategies.

The information sheets on the  Altogether Autism website include classroom strategies for optimising learning and managing behaviour.

Education and behavioural plans

Not all of your students will need an IEP. For most of those who do, their IEP covers only specific aspects of their learning. An IEP is not a substitute for curriculum – it identifies a small set of priority goals and strategies that will enable the student to learn and develop within the context of the curriculum.

It [the IEP process] is about writing students into The New Zealand Curriculum rather than writing students out.

Principal quote, Ministry of Education, 2011b, page 5

Collaboration for Success: Individual Education Plans and the website IEP Online are Ministry of Education resources to support schools whose IEP processes are not working as well as they would like.

As the title suggests, Collaboration for Success stresses the value of collaboration across all members of a student’s care community and describes how this can be achieved. Collaboration is entirely consistent with the value of inclusion.

School leaders can use the process of collaboration for developing IEPs to foster inclusion across the school. For example, leaders could invite the teachers involved to share their experiences with the rest of the staff and then conduct workshops on how what has been learned could be usefully transferred to other school activities and processes.  

Behaviour Intervention Plans

Psychologist Leonard Nel is one of the contributors to Autism at School: A Video Resource for Teachers and Parents in New Zealand. He has developed Behaviour Intervention Plans (BIPs) to support students to develop the learning and behavioural skills they need to function.

The plans have three dimensions:

  • Prevention: What can we do to prevent the behaviour?
  • New skills: What skills does the student need to support the function of the behaviour?
  • Reaction strategies: What do we need to do when the behaviour occurs?

Nels describes three possible reaction strategies:

  1. to ignore the behaviour (however, this can result in the student escalating the unwanted behaviour because they haven’t got the response they sought). What works better is
  2. to redirect the student to a preferred activity (this may seem to be ‘giving in’, but has the purpose of training the person and re-framing their behaviour)
  3. to provide praise at the first opportunity.

Positive Behaviour for Learning

Positive Behaviour for Learning (PB4L)] is a new Ministry of Education website that offers programmes and initiatives to help parents, teachers, and schools promote positive behaviour in children and young people. It brings together information from research with practical strategies and programmes. It also gives examples of strategies in action, along with information about where to get help.

The website has sections on:

  • encouraging positive behaviours
  • deterring bullying
  • responding to an incident
  • being confident (from the perspectives of boards, school or centre leaders, teachers, and parents)
  • getting help and support.

There are instructions on how to develop a behaviour intervention plan and links to readings and tools for understanding the purpose behind a behaviour in order to support the student to adopt a more positive alternative.

The website also offers checklists and links to monitoring and self-review tools that you can use to assess your school’s climate.

Strategic use of teacher aides

Many of the parents who were consulted in the development of this website were concerned about the lack of training and funding for teacher aides. The Ministry of Education’s Review of Special Education expressed similar concerns. These concerns reflect a belief that teacher aides are important resources to support inclusion, but can become a barrier if they and the teachers who work with them are not properly trained.

Kearney (2009) notes that a theme in the literature on the use of teacher aides is of classroom teachers handing over responsibility for their ‘least powerful and qualified staff … to the least powerful students’ (page 48). She suggests that this ‘perpetuates the devalued status of disabled students, both in the eyes of the disabled student and in the eyes of others’ (ibid.).  

New Zealand student and disability advocate Katherine Rees describes how the presence of a teacher aide cut her off from her peers:

Common practice was to have the teacher aid sit beside me throughout the lesson to justify the role. My experience at school was that when the teacher aid was absent, I was able to interact well with my peers. But when the aid was present, right beside me, to provide what was believed to be “the best support possible‟, I was ostracized and cut off from my classmates.

Page 5

A study by Giangreco, Edelman, Luisella, and McFarland (1997) identified the following negative effects on students with disabilities when their instructional assistants ‘hovered’ rather than ‘helped’:

  • interference with ownership and responsibility by general educators
  • separation from classmates
  • dependence on adults
  • impact on peer interactions
  • limitations on receiving competent instruction
  • loss of personal control
  • loss of gender identity
  • interference with instruction of other students.

In the report of her experiences with the Consortium for Collaborative Research on Social Relationships of Children and Youth with Diverse Abilities, Meyer (2001) describes how, by adolescence, some non-disabled students seem almost envious of the close relationship between students with disabilities and their teacher aide:

… they told us that it must be great having an adult with you to do everything for you and be with you all the time – mentoring you and caring about you. They do not see that there is any space or need for them as peers or friends. This child is well taken care of and that is how they talk about it.

Page 27

If any of these concerns have emerged as an issue at your school, you may wish to consider Giangreco et al.’s implications for practice (1997, page 16). 

From her perspective as a student with a disability, Katherine Rees makes the following suggestions:

  • In some situations, all she needed was someone to take notes for her. A dictaphone would have sufficed.
  • On other occasions she needed more direct support, but she would still have preferred the aide to be available to the whole class, not just to her.
  • Teachers and teacher aides could build stronger relationships. Teacher aides could make suggestions about how planned lessons could be adapted for disabled students and could help in the construction of learning resources. (For a student with ASD, for example, this could be visual aids such as a chart detailing what to expect.)

I believe that all students are competent and have the ability to make up their own minds and have a say.

Gill Rutherford, Radio New Zealand National Programme, One in Five, October 2010

Gill Rutherford is a former high school teacher, now a senior lecturer at the University of Otago. Her doctoral thesis on the role of teacher aides includes a discussion of the unhelpful effects of some teacher aide practices, structured around Giangreco et al.’s indicators (listed above). However, she also points out the positive effect of many teacher aides on the learning of students with disabilities, the quality of their relationships with those students, and the significance of their contribution in advocating on the students’ behalf:

In many respects, one of the most important aspects of aides’ work was that which was beyond the scope of any job description, in challenging the “sense of inevitability” in the education of disabled students and in advocating for “some better alternative” for these students. In other words, they harnessed the power of their feelings (Rosenau, 2004) to act on students’ behalf, to enact their rights to communicate, to learn, and to develop reciprocal relationships. In doing so, they facilitated opportunities for teachers and peers to come to know disabled students on a more personal and human level (Robertson et al., 2003), thereby increasing the possibility that, alongside recognising and respecting students’ individuality and difference, they might also recognise and respect their rights as human beings.

Pages 239–240

An implication for practice is that schools might seek ways to make better use of the resource they have in their teacher aides. For example, how might you:

  • include teacher aides in IEP meetings?
  • allow time for teachers and teacher aides to conduct joint planning?
  • provide teacher aides with professional development?
  • sustain relationships that are working well to support students through transitions?

Giangreco et al.’s research (1997) was an important source for Rutherford’s thesis. It includes a bulleted list of the considerations for thinking about how teacher aides are hired, used, trained, and supervised.

Reflective questions

  • What strategies do our teachers use to adapt the classroom environment and curriculum to meet the needs and build upon the strengths of our students with ASD?
  • Do IEPs/BIPs at our school address outcomes that are valued for the students and support their learning and development in line with the curriculum? Do we take a collaborative approach to the creation of IEPs?
  • How do we use teacher aides at our school? How do we ensure they are supported and listened to?